Friday, November 5, 2010

Ralph Nader and the flaming Pinto vaccines

by S. Stone

The H1N1 flu vaccines are the flaming Pinto of vaccines. Ralph Nader is badly needed.

Joseph Mercola reports that the product has already been proven to be sickening and even killing people.

By June of 2010, more than 1,000 adverse reactions in children under the age of 5 resulted in the Australian government's banning of flu vaccines for that age group.High fevers, vomiting and convulsions were the most widely reported reactions, which are also associated with long-term adverse health outcomes.

Australian "public health experts have called for an independent body to monitor drug safety after it emerged that young children were more likely to end up in hospitals because of side effects from a flu vaccine than they were from the disease itself.

In Finland, France and Sweden, narcolepsy was reported in teenage children in response to Pandemrix monovalent swine flu vaccine, leading the Finnish government to suspend its use.

In Korea, nearly 2,600 swine flu vaccine side effects were reported as of August 2010, ranging from allergic reactions to fevers to headaches—and including 10 deaths.

According to Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), a special government committee has been created to investigate last year's H1N1 monovalent vaccine for signs it may be associated with more adverse reactions. What the committee found out provisionally is there were three signs of trouble with the H1N1 swine flu vaccine used last year

Fisher outlined these three primary health concerns in a recent NVIC video update:

  1. Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), an autoimmune disease which has been associated with influenza vaccine since 1976, when the swine flu vaccine was first used. In fact, British government health experts acknowledged the link between the H1N1 vaccine and an increased risk of GBS earlier this month. Prior to this public admittance, the government had always denied such a link

  1. Idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP), an autoimmune disorder, is a blood clotting disorder characterized by insufficient platelets

  1. Bell's palsy, a reaction causing temporary facial paralysis

But Nader would face a new product safety terrain, since the US government has become the marketing and PR agent for the manufacturers of this deadly product and during Bush, arranged
"medical martial laws" to force it on people.

The other day, I went into a Walgreens store. The store had numerous signs along the road beside it urging people to get their flu shots which I'd never seen done before. And when I went in, before I was even in the door, I was greeted with an invitation to get a flu vaccine. I responded, "Are you joking?" The greeter mumbled something about being forced to say it and it was and walked off. I went to the pharmacy to object and there was met with signs for flu shots, gift cards for flu shots, and the hello from the pharmacist was "Have you had your flu shot yet?"

To be quite frank, it was more than a little off-putting. When I told the pharmacist that, he apologized and said he felt guilty greeting people like that, and even worse giving them the vaccines, because he has never taken a flu shot in his life, doesn't intend to, and doesn't think they're safe. He said it was a new corporate policy and it disturbed him.

The whole H1N1 vaccine (now buried in the seasonal "flu" shot) is part of the most aggressive vaccine campaign ever seen here. People can and have lost jobs for not submitting to this vaccine, one that has never been tested by safety, has no record of efficacy, contains nanoparticles associated with DNA damage, has caused Guillaume Barre, comas, seizures, miscarriages and deaths. And the more flaming the Pinto vaccine is, the more the CDC pushes it.

Since it's clear they are not saving people from anything with the vaccine, what are they doing then? Some say just making money for the vaccine companies. Some say intending to intentionally harm people. But whatever they are doing, truth and human rights are out the window.

The justification for these flaming vaccines was last year's "pandemic." The EU Parliament exposed it was faked and a kickback scheme between the drug companies and the WHO. Media has not covered that here but media is closely connected to the makers of the flaming vaccines.

The British Medical Journal was openly critical of the "pandemic" itself and the WHO.

'A joint investigation by the BMJ and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has uncovered evidence that raises troubling questions about how WHO managed conflicts of interest among the scientists who advised its pandemic planning, and about the transparency of the science underlying its advice to governments. Was it appropriate for WHO to take advice from experts who had declarable financial and research ties with pharmaceutical companies producing antivirals and influenza vaccines? Why was key WHO guidance authored by an influenza expert who had received payment for other work from Roche, manufacturers of oseltamivir, and GlaxoSmithKline, manufacturers of zanamivir? And why does the composition of the emergency committee from which Chan sought guidance remain a secret known only to those within WHO? We are left wondering whether major public health organisations are able to effectively manage the conflicts of interest that are inherent in medical science.'

And the man at the WHO who is the leading "pandemic fear" monger there - from SARS to Ebola to Avian flu to Swine Flu - is under investigation himself for corruption around all this.

"For the past 6 months, one could barely switch on the television in the Netherlands without seeing the face of famed virus hunter Albert Osterhaus talking about the swine flu pandemic. Or so it has seemed. Osterhaus, who runs an internationally renowned virus lab at Erasmus Medical Center, has been Mr. Flu. But last week, his reputation took a nosedive after it was alleged that he has been stoking pandemic fears to promote his own business interests in vaccine development. As Science went to press, the Dutch House of Representatives had even slated an emergency debate about the matter. ...

In an interview with Der Spiegel magazine in Germany, epidemiologist Dr. Tom Jefferson of the Cochrane Collaboration, an organization of independent scientists evaluating all flu related studies, noted the implications of the privatization of WHO and the commercialization of health:

"…one of the extraordinary features of this influenza -- and the whole influenza saga -- is that there are some people who make predictions year after year, and they get worse and worse. None of them so far have come about, and these people are still there making these predictions. For example, what happened with the bird flu, which was supposed to kill us all? Nothing. But that doesn't stop these people from always making their predictions. Sometimes you get the feeling that there is a whole industry almost waiting for a pandemic to occur.

SPIEGEL: Who do you mean? The World Health Organization (WHO)?

Jefferson: The WHO and public health officials, virologists and the pharmaceutical companies. They've built this machine around the impending pandemic. And there's a lot of money involved, and influence, and careers, and entire institutions! And all it took was one of these influenza viruses to mutate to start the machine grinding...

Along those lines, the CDC which is now saying that everyone over six months should take the vaccines is the same CDC which put out entirely false numbers on the numbers of H1N1 cases last year and may be falsifying data on the number of miscarriages the H1N1 vaccine has caused.

In a relevant footnote, the Washington Post on December 8 in an article on the severity, or lack of same, of the world H1N1 „pandemic" reported that "with the second wave of H1N1 infections having crested in the United States, leading epidemiologists are predicting that the pandemic could end up ranking as the mildest since modern medicine began documenting influenza outbreaks."

We are smack dab in the middle of a pharmaceutical industry fiction, in which a corporation is yet again stealing billions from the public, and it would be really disgusting if it weren't much more - grotesquely dangerous to life.

Vaccines are not a regular product. Would you buy a product when you don't know for sure what is in it, but what is known is clearly toxic, when the package insert states that a percentage of people using that product will die, when the product isn't tested for safety and there is no proof it even works for what it is advertised to do, when the companies making the product which doesn't necessarily work but has a chance of killing you are immune from all liability? And what would you think of the government working for the companies making the product - which you know now is killing people - and using its power on behalf of the corporations to mandate the product or even use the military to force it on you?

And, incredibly, the government has recently created a new rule for the vaccine manufacturers which are already not testing the vaccines, letting them add or change any ingredient with the approval of only one FDA employee (the janitor?). Squalene is not approved in the US because of its link to Gulf War Syndrome. The H1N1 in Europe contained a millions times that dosage, with one doctor there saying it appeared "murderous" to him. Bush, who set in motion the whole pandemic apparatus and inserted the pandemic martial laws, spoke of vaccines with squalene here, and Obama's stimulus package included a large contract for HHS and Novartis to produce it (and cell cultures from dog kidneys). Which means that as bad as the flaming Pinto vaccines already are, at any moment now the manufacturers could include an ingredient associated arthritis, fibromyalgia, lymphadenopathy, rashes, photosensitive rashes, malar rashes, chronic fatigue, chronic headaches, abnormal body hair loss, non-healing skin lesions, aphthous ulcers, dizziness, weakness, memory loss, seizures, mood changes, neuropsychiatric problems, anti-thyroid effects, anaemia, elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), Raynaud's phenomenon, Sjorgren's syndrome, chronic diarrhoea, night sweats and low-grade fevers.

Think of the Pinto. You know it doesn't work right, you know tests show things could go badly wrong and burn people to death, you know that has actually been happening. But the government is withdrawing it but ordering you not only to buy it but to have to drive it - and with your wife and kids in it. Imagine if you say "no" because you don't want to risk it, and you lose your job for that. Imagine the government not only doesn't recall it but creates a rule to let the company put in a part banned in the US. Imagine the government, for the sake of the company, declares a national emergency and says the Pinto now needs no testing at all, and everyone must drive it, and if you don't drive it, the military will give you a choice between going to prison or having you and your whole family strapped into it and being forced to step on the gas.

The difference between the flaming Pinto and the flaming vaccines is you could bail out of the Pinto. They aren't jamming it into your body to have unknown effects for the rest of your and your family's life.

And then when one considers the source of the flaming Pinto vaccine, the pharmaceutical industry, it doesn't reassure that they are one of the most criminally corrupt industries here (they recently won that prize), and that is putting aside their history of being literal war criminals, including killing people with vaccines. It also doesn't reassure that the Nuremberg Code was designed to protect people from being forced into medical experiments but with the mandating of vaccines (which the pharmaceutical industry has arranged through the WHO and various governments over which it has great influence), it entirely evades the very code designed to protect human beings from forced medical "experiments" or "treatments." Through their dark connection to George Bush, they have managed to arrange a potential replay of such forced "treatments."

The manufacturers doesn't have to do squat to prove the flaming Pinto vaccines are safe, and just like with the car, there is already evidence they are in fact very dangerous. Nader got the Pinto recalled. But now, instead of the vaccines being recalled, the public is caught in an unreal but nightmarish corporate scheme in which government plays the PR agent for the pharmaceutical industry, removing their liability, installing laws to mandate their products, putting out false data to scare people into taking something that the government should be protecting people from, and has even arranged to have military on the ground - for a flu? - to force their product on people.

The flaming Pinto H1N1 flu vaccines are a product. And a very bum one at that. There is no pandemic and never was. The H1N1 "pandemic" is a financial and medical and political/military scandal. And the CDC is part of it. It and HHS are not caring health agencies trying to protect the public from a health threat but unconstitutional collusive partners with pharmaceutical corporations, letting them use government power to force their potentially deadly products not just on people but INTO them.

Clearly, the government has no right to subject their own citizens to something that can maim, sterilize or kill them. Ralph Nader needs to revamp what "product safety" means today in the context of corporations using government to fake disease scares and to force products on people which they not only don't want but which could kill them.

The CDC itself says, based on manufacturers' own package inserts - which would tend to understate the danger - that 30,000 people would be expected to die from the H1N1 vaccine. Something is terribly wrong with this vaccine picture.

Would it have been all right for the government to give immunity from liability for the Pinto manufacturers? Would it have been okay for Pinto to have included an insert saying how many people could expect to be burned to death from the car - a kind of warning - while then getting the government to force people into it?

Add together the WWII history of the companies, the ties to Bush, the faked pandemic and terror-mongering for profit and WHO corruption, their non-testing, their non-efficacy, their toxic ingredients, the medical martial laws Bush put in place to try to force them, the disorders and deaths they are already causing, and the Flaming Pinto vaccines may be the most hellish commercial products ever created.

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Leaked trade agreements and hidden things inside S 510: Corporations plan to end normal farming

M. Gardner

The Canadian Farmers Union wants the Canada-EU trade deal scrapped.

Under provisions in CETA [Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement], using saved seed could result in a farmer's land, equipment, and crops being seized for alleged infringement of intellectual property rights attached to plant varieties owned by corporations such as Monsanto, Dow, Syngenta, and Bayer.

"It includes the freezing of bank accounts too, so you couldn't even defend yourself in court. And this is for alleged infringement," says NFU [National Farmers Union] president Terry Boehm. ...

"These are the most draconian measures possible and they would literally create a culture of fear in the farm population where, I think, that ultimately farmers would end up buying seeds every year for every acre just to avoid prosecution or the threat of prosecution."

The biotech industry is facing exposure of the health dangers of GMO/pesticide dependent crops, of attacks on scientists (even armed ones), and GMOs' poor crop performance across different crops, public outrage at no labeling of GMOs, media scorn at its humiliatingly poor science, and falling stock value. Is the industry now attempting an end run around all this, by trying to criminalize and thus end normal (organic) farming - its increasingly sought after, healthy, higher-performing competition?

Given the "draconian property rights enforcement measures" the biotech corporations wish put into effect through the Canada-EU free trade agreement, one might wonder.

US farmers face the same assault by their own government on behalf of agribusiness and the biotech industry. S 510, a "food safety" bill waiting for the Senate return, would put the US fully under the WTO and thus harmonize with CETA. It is replete with means to do to American farmers what the EU/Canada CETA plan would do to Canadian ones - and potentially more, including surreptitiously arranging to criminalize agricultural water, manure, essential farming equipment, and seed storage.

41 words inside S 510 would make the US subject to CETA.

    Nothing in this Act (or an amendment made by this Act) shall be construed in a manner inconsistent with the agreement establishing the World Trade Organization or any other treaty or international agreement to which the United States is a party.

The significance of those words in S 510 is that they would end the Uruguay Round Agreement Act of 1994, which put US sovereignty and US law under perfect protection. Under S 510, US law would become subservient to the WTO, a corporate organization. Votes in the US would not matter. The decisions on food, energy, health, resources, and US economic policy would be made the very corporations responsible for contaminating food, oil spills, dangerous drugs, theft of common resources, and destroying the economy.

The enforcement powers created by S 510 (assuming it resembles other "food safety" bills) would be unlimited and apply to everyone in the country who "holds" food (does anyone not?).

S 510, a "food safety" bill, would (using sections from other food safety bills) set up a corporate court outside the constitutional court system. The expectation is that it would be run by Monsanto, just as "food safety" at the FDA is now, with Monsanto involved at every level. It would exist without Congressional oversight, with unlimited and unspecified remedies, "in addition to, and not exclusive of, other remedies that may be available," and without judicial review over even "the validity and appropriateness of the order ..."

That upturning of all sense (orders that don't have to be appropriate or valid) is a window into the extremity of power being sought by the corporations through S 510. That power would include total discretion to punish anyone they may wish. And in removing appropriateness and validity, their orders would not have to relate to food at all and could be used against anyone, applying any form of "remedy" they desire. Nothing whatever is excluded.

The merger of corporate and government power is defined as fascism.

    • LIMITATION ON REVIEW- In a civil action under paragraph (1), the validity and appropriateness of the order of the Administrator assessing the civil penalty shall not be subject to judicial review.

      [Unless someone has died from a food related issue, which would put the case into a real criminal court, everything else would be "dealt with" as a civil penalty. S 510 includes long prison terms for mistakes in paperwork and "labeling" (to be defined at the discretion of those in charge), and from the leaked EU/Canada trade plans, seizures of farmers' crops and equipment and freezing of bank accounts are clearly sought.]

      Remedies Not Exclusive- The remedies provided in this section are in addition to, and not exclusive of, other remedies that may be available.

While not listed as a civil "remedy" but treated as disease prevention, slaughter of their animals is another Orwellian measure within S 510 which goes well beyond seizures to military arrangements with the DOD and DHS. They would come onto farms and slaughter normal animals if any disease outbreak is announced, regardless of harmlessness. "Valid and appropriate" do not matter.

This is not a "food safety" bill, as even a short overview of S 510 makes clear.

S 510 offers numerous ways for corporations to get rid of farmers and take their land. The astounding falsity of forcing farmers (or anyone with a farm animal) to sign onto a international contract in which they lose their rights to their property is transparent. Taking global coordinates of the size and shape of farmers' land and feeding them into a corporate data bank, has nothing to do with tracing animal diseases. Farmers' addresses are known.

But the USDA lie about wanting to stop animal diseases grows especially repugnant when one with awareness that the USDA is actually working against the vehement protests of cattle ranchers, to import potentially diseased animals from Brazil and to transfer an off-shore animal disease lab to Kansas, the heart of cattle country and the most tornado prone state in the country, while it's well known that it was lab leaks in the UK which led to the slaughter of millions of cattle, whether ill or not.

Such mass slaughter of animals is structured by S 510 and is yet another gift to the biotech industry for without the extermination of normal animals, their investment in GE-animals and GMO meat is worthless.

The corporations, faced with public upset at ravages of industrial agriculture and the contaminated food coming out of it, are using fear of food, fear of minor animal diseases (including a faked H1N1 pandemic still promoted by government agencies), and lies and fraud to try to eliminate real farming in the US and to facilitate the theft of all US farmland.

The greed and hubris of S 510 pales in comparison to its unconstitutionality and danger to life.

The grass roots are saying no to S 510, each in their own idioms, whether by referring to the Constitution or to the Founding Fathers and to rights or to patriotism. Across the political spectrum, people are coming together to reject S 510 on constitutional and human rights grounds, and the plans of those behind this extreme corporate bill.

The corporate attempt to end US farming and set up their own court system over all Americans far outstrips the destruction of jobs, the forcing of millions from their homes, Citizens United, and the Wall Street theft. Now, through S 510, the corporations seek to remove all bounds on what they themselves do, on what they can do to any who oppose them, and on what they can seize. And this is only on the food side.

The threats to health are as profound. S 510 would remove the long sought cure for cancer as well as cures for an endless array of diseases, by removing access to supplements (one in particular). S 510 would suppress a medical revolution poised to free mankind from all fear of disease, leaving the country instead at the mercy of a pharmaceutical industry with a disturbing history and recent threatening actions with vaccines.

With S 510, those behind GMOs, vaccines, and drugs seek to remove access to normal farming, normal food and to nutrition (health) itself. They are seeking total dominance over what sustains life and over people.

S 510 is not a food safety bill. What is it, then? Is it a corporate enabling act? Does it open the door to corporate control over all Americans, all food supplies and health resources, and all US farmland?

Canadian Farmers Union are demanding that the draconian trade plans with the EU be scrapped. Will groups here demand the same of S 510?

Friday, October 22, 2010

Protecting the good things in life by stopping S 510

by S. Marks

Ironically, there is much to be gained from the devastation of the US economy. Money has proved a false god. Others control it and buy democracy with it - courts, Congress, presidents, agencies. Corporate advertising wears thin. Is the new car model in the ad fun to drive past shuttered businesses and homeless people on the street?

A Great Age of Greed was sold to everyone via corporate media - want more, remodel yet again, be cool, faster, faster. Women who forwent extra income to stay home with their children were made to feel worthless, those going to work encouraged into an orgy of purchases to expiate guilt toward children they'd left. Children were taught to hunger for things, and then for new things. Everything, including sexuality, was commodified. The models for behavior became paid models, the dreams - those engineered by corporate executives with long term plans for how to bilk the society by breaking down all values that defended against excess and greed.

As all that "Trump"ed up excess now collapses into joblessness and homelessness, thanks to bank and corporate theft, what emerges from the rubble? Belief in something larger than ourselves - family, courage, nature, sharing, community, love .... All are there, none having "dropped in value," as material things do. They are the true riches in life, waiting to shelter everyone.

With all that has been lost, people are rethinking jobs dependent on others and what most simply provides enough to support life and many are seeing it comes down to the very basics - the earth and food. When people grow their own food and share with neighbors, they walk away from a money economy controlled by others. They do not pay for food and are not touched by food price rises, and they automatically protect their health. In all this, they become more connected to neighbors and to nature, increasingly skilled in self-sufficiency, and freer as people. This shift to simpler lives has so much offer, an increasing number of people are choosing it voluntarily and finding happiness.

The corporations are aware that if people can grow their own food and look after their health through good food, their investments in agribusiness and processed food and pharmaceuticals will wither. People dependent on supermarkets mean profit and as well as ill health and that in itself is worth a fortune. And people raising their own food, closely connected to neighbors, and with a strong sense of community values, are not the passive and ignorant consumers corporations depend on for sales.

Corporations have used advertising to dress up dangerous products and hide the reality of the food industry. They have also done all they could to suppress knowledge that natural substances have been curing disease after disease (with thousands of studies to back them up), and have raided those providing natural substances and imprisoned doctors for attempting to provide cures, for the pharmaceutical industry's investment and the power based on it would be destroyed by cures. It exists by fear and disease. An industry so corrupt the WHO is warning about it, it controls medicine and media. Occasionally, astounding media carries the truth and goes viral.

To ensure that stealing homes and jobs will force people into greater dependency and helplessness, rather than toward a free life, agribusiness, the food industry and the pharmaceutical industry (in many ways, indistinguishable) have introduced "food safety" bills into Congress that would shut off everyone's means to look after themselves, through food and nutritional health.

This article cannot begin to give adequate detail on how disturbing these bills are (e.g. threat to farmers, to gardens, to animals, to supplements, to human rights, to constitutional law).

"If accepted [S 510] would preclude the public's right to grow, own, trade, transport, share, feed and eat each and every food that nature makes. It will become the most offensive authority against the cultivation, trade and consumption of food and agricultural products of one's choice. It will be unconstitutional and contrary to natural law or, if you like, the will of God." ~Dr. Shiv Chopra, Canada Health whistleblower

Suffice to say, these are corporate bills and the corporations are at a crossroads in history and know it. Human beings have learned they are being made sick from toxic corporate products (e.g. food, drugs, vaccines, pesticides, hormones, antibiotics, housing materials, plastics) and are sick of it. They understand that health comes from clean food which comes only from clean and humane sources - all of them non-corporate. Corporations offer unclean, unsafe food and sickness, so people are increasingly buying directly from farmers and growing their own food. Corporate profit has no place in either. Rather than allow themselves to be bypassed, the only option the corporations have is to remove all other options (the decent ones) from the public, leaving only corporate products, which, in medicine, they are pushing through faked pandemics and behind the scenes state legislators to impose mandates.

From the public already robbed of jobs and homes, the corporations are set to steal the very basics of life now - food and health. They have arranged to end access to a known (but suppressed) cures for cancer and other diseases, and to safe food itself. The "food safety" bills - S 510 and S 3767 - would do both.

The public is on the cusp of a chance for a full and happy life of good food and assured health, and the freedom both imply. Or they face corporate control over their lives and premature deaths.

With such a clear alternative and so much good to be had, perhaps people will begin informing every possible person they know, so each person can in turn reach hundreds of others, and everyone can call and then continue calling Senators and emailing Senators (on their own websites) and faxing them.

No one should solely rely on organizations and "clicks" to do this work for them because many organizations that may sound "pro-people" receive funding from the very corporations and bankers behind these bills. Using organizations' "click system" is only all safe if it comes on top of each person's personal efforts to reach as many friends and family and colleagues as possible, and then to reach Senators on one's own.

Sunday, October 17, 2010

The Dawn of A New Age in Medicine: Physics Offers A Unified Field Theory of All Disease

by T H Reeme

For more than 75 years, a remarkable thing has been occurring in medicine - rapid and full cures of disease after disease by a single treatment. This major revolution in medical thought should have been heralded as the most wonderful possible news - other than world peace - in mankind's history. For we are now at the dawn of moment in medical science that is so immense in its implications it has never even be fantasized - this astounding renaissance in medical thinking frees human beings from fear of all diseases.

In the simplest terms, physics has been applied to biologic science, offering a theoretical understanding of the rapid and full cures that had already been occurring in practice. Seeing through the endless complexity of diseases and disorders which the old paradigm has generated and still continues to add to, along with an even greater complexity of treatments, physics has yielded a single common denominator true for all disease, cancers, toxins, infections and viruses. Health is based on electron flow. Diseases, toxins, infections, viruses, all deplete that flow. The more serious the disease threat, the greater the depletion. With that common denominator, physics could support the idea of a single effective treatment, and a description of how it cures - anything that can deliver electrons in a sufficiently high enough concentration to where it is needed in the body, can neutralize any disease (any loss of electrons).

Vitamin C, particularly in IV concentrations, had been curing people, and physics allied with biology has now made it clear why. Vitamin C, like other anti-oxidants, provides electrons, but it surpasses all others in its bioavailability to the body.

This insight stands on the shoulders of the work of indigenous and traditional healers going back 1000s of years - Chinese medicine, Ayurvedic medicine, all those who found in nature the means to heal diseases. All have relied on nutrients.

There is one salient difference between nutrients and synthetic drugs of "modern medicine" which stands in stark relief. Nutrients all deliver electrons.

Drugs and vaccines all deplete electrons.

It is almost impossible to convey the import of this gargantuan paradigmatic shift for medicine. The David of medicine - using nature through nutritional supplements - has allied with physics to hit the Goliath of the pharmaceutical industry dead center of it forehead with a single stone - disease is based on loss of electrons and they are making it worse. Everything Goliath does takes away more, adding to disease conditions. Everything David does restores them, and in one case - IV vitamin C - does so in unequalled measure.

The glorious implications for humanity's health run neck and neck with the end of humanity's fear of disease, for first place.

But as remarkable and freeing as this historical juncture for medicine and mankind is, there has been an equally remarkable (and brutal) suppression. While Goliath has been dealt a death blow, he has not yet fallen.

Thoughts of the Catholic Church's using the Inquisition to suppress the truth of Galileo's work, come to mind.

Galileo's support of Copernican astronomy - the sun not the earth is the central body around which planets circulate - conflicted with the Aristotelian view of the universe held by the Catholic Church. Galileo was tried by the Inquisition for heresy. They "delivered their unanimous report: the idea that the Sun is stationary is "foolish and absurd in philosophy, and formally heretical since it explicitly contradicts in many places the sense of Holy Scripture..."; while the Earth's movement "receives the same judgement in philosophy and ... in regard to theological truth it is at least erroneous in faith." ... Galileo was found guilty. The Inquisition sentence came in three parts:

  • Galileo was found "vehemently suspect of heresy," namely of having held the opinions that the Sun lies motionless at the centre of the universe, that the Earth is not at its centre and moves, and that one may hold and defend an opinion as probable after it has been declared contrary to Holy Scripture. He was required to "abjure, curse, and detest" those opinions.
  • He was sentenced to formal imprisonment at the pleasure of the Inquisition. On the following day this was commuted to house arrest, which he remained under for the rest of his life.
  • His offending Dialogue was banned; and in an action not announced at the trial, publication of any of his works was forbidden, including any he might write in the future.

To understand the relation between what happened to Galileo and what is occurring now, the focus should be on the tremendous edifice of the Catholic Church at the time. It controlled governments, finances, people's positions, thought, the definition of salvation, and even life and death. From there, it could took it upon itself to "decide" whether the sun or earth was central in the cosmos and to dispense with Galileo who through his telescope saw something that contradicted the Church's doctrine. The Church, then, has the power to "dispense" with reality.

What edifice is there now which has the power to suppress 75 years of facts of astounding cures from a single source, and to continue on with the mind-boggling complexity of diseases and treatments and in the absence of cures? The pharmaceutical industry. Just as with the Catholic Church, has constructed an edifice whose financial power derives from a fixed belief system and the tithes (profit) from such a system. This edifice rests on medical schools, research institutes, foundations, control of government, medical societies, medical conventions, media, medical journals, and corruption so pervasive and endemic, it is now being warned of as a threat to medical science itself. The beginnings of this system included taking control of medical education by wealthy interests invested in the pharmaceutical industry and with a history of extreme power.

"The Commonwealth Fund reports a half a million dollars in one year alone appropriated for this purpose, while the Rockefeller Foundation boasts of over twenty thousand fellowships and scholarships for the training of medical instructors.

"In The Money Givers, Joseph Goulden touches upon this sensitive nerve when he says:

If the foundations chose to speak, their voice would resound with the solid clang of the cash register. ... But the foundations' "innovative money" goes for research, not for the production of doctors who treat human beings. ....

"Dr. David L. Edsall at one time was the Dean of the Harvard Medical School. The conditions he describes at Harvard are the same as those at every other medical school in America:

I was, for a period, a professor of therapeutics and pharmacology, and I knew from experience that students were obliged then by me and by others to learn about an interminable number of drugs, many of which were valueless, many of them useless, some probably, even harmful . . . Almost all subjects must be taken at exactly the same time, and in almost exactly in the same way by all students, and the amount introduced into each course is such that few students have time or energy to explore any subject in a spirit of independent interest. A little comparison shows that there is less intellectual freedom in the medical course than in almost any other form of professional education in this country.

Ideas on treatment that do not redound to the pharmaceutical industry's interests, such natural un-patented treatments that heal, and especially a single un-patented product that can cure disease after disease, assuredly do not. They not only do not receive media attention and do not receive funding for more research into why they heal, but practitioners have faced disparagement, being run of out medicine and even being imprisoned for offering them. Vitamin C offers a shining renaissance in medicine but the edifice of the pharmaceutical industry has maintained a brutal medical dark ages.

"The day when orthodox medicine finally embraces the field of nutrition will be the day when the cartel behind it also has monopolized the vitamin and food product industry essential to it - not one day before."

That day is now.

The FDA, through "food safety" bills S 510 and S 3767, has plans to take control of all food in the US and to end access to supplements, including vitamin C. This fits within a larger international plan called Codex Alimentarius (designed by a pharmaceutical industry CEO who was sent to prison for medical war crimes) to control all food in the world and limit access to adequate nutrition, following the inherent logic of the industry - profit depends on disease, the more disease the more profit, and removal of nutrition would yield endless diseases. Thus nutrition becomes the greatest possible threat to the industry and degrading food and removing access to nutrients becomes essential.

The same FDA has recently imprisoned an herbalist for offering a treatment for skin cancer, threatened cherry growers with closure for any reference to cherries being potentially ten times stronger than non-steroidal anti-inflammatories such as aspirin and ibuprofen, for lowering pain and inflammation, imprisoned a man for selling Rife machines which are associated with harming no one and offer a means of treating disease by using energy), banned ear candles (a traditional means of cleaning the ears of wax), just banned chelation solutions (detoxing from heavy metals) used by parents trying to help their autistic children though there is no history of harm (vitamin C may be covertly included as a chelation solution), and moving beyond its long history of terrifying raids on health practitioners and nutrition companies, has now begun going after natuarl food using armed FBI to attack a small organic food coop, conspiring to close down food buying clubs, raiding Amish farms, .... the list goes on. This same FDA, approves GE-salmon, bans farmers from labeling their food as GMO or not, seeks to ban all labeling of GMOs (including banning organic labeling). And in terms of health, what is occurring there with vaccines may be the most disturbing threat of all, especially given the dark pharmaceutical industry history of intentionally killing with vaccines, and even very recent behavior with them, and given speeches by powerful people connected to the industry, connecting their use to "lowering population."

Things are so scientifically rotten at the FDA that its own scientists sent out a warning letter about corruption there, and had to do so anonymously.

Where the Catholic Church used the fear of hell and its special power to save souls, the FDA, on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry, has come up with its own fear - "food safety" - over which it assigns itself total power to "save" the public. The Catholic Church burned people alive to save their souls. The FDA, in the name of protecting people from unsafe food, seeks power to "preclude the public's right to grow, own, trade, transport, share, feed and eat each and every food that nature makes. It will [have] the most offensive authority against the cultivation, trade and consumption of food and agricultural products of one's choice. It will be unconstitutional and contrary to natural law or, if you like, the will of God."

Those behind "food safety" - the weapon by which they are attempting to remove supplements in the US and which was used to ban all herbal remedies in the EU - are those responsible for 100,000 deaths a year from their drugs, for food contaminated with their products - hormones, antibiotics, pesticides, GMOs, etc., which threaten true food safety and everyone's health. The dissonance between their unsafe food and their manipulative use of the words "food safety" has a totalitarian resonance, not surprising given that those who designed this plan, once used another grotesque and false promotion of "hygiene" - "racial hygiene."

This stunning Galileo moment removes hygiene and diseases themselves from the center of the medical universe. It removes drugs and vaccines, as well, along with "research" seeking cures which the pharmaceutical industry, for financial reasons, could never allow. Instead of illness, the center of the medical universe is now electron flow - the very definition of life - and a single natural substance which abundantly provides it.

In astronomy, Galileo shifted the focus of the cosmos away from man and his planet, to the sun. There is strong parallel to what physics has now done in medicine, altering the focus from infinite disease symptoms to energy itself (electrons).

The Galileo story is telling because the Church's power didn't ultimately triumph over reality. But the world may not want to wait through more years and decades of suppression and the agonizing yet preventable deaths that would mean.

The Catholic Church attempted to put all other thought out of reach. The pharmaceutical industry is attempting, through false science and corruption at every level, to put nature itself off limit to human beings - either by altering it and then claiming to own it through patents, or by subverting governments to get them to apply authoritarian regulations which would prevent people from having access to nature - such as the EU ban on all herbals remedies, and now a plan in Australia to ban 1000s of common plants (many if not most with medicinal properties). and on IV vitamin C here as an unapproved drug. Will the world allow it?

People are at a wonderful moment in history. They know now there is an answer to all diseases, infections, viruses, toxins. There is no longer reason to fear. This puts the pharmaceutical industry's false pandemics and vaccines in a stark light - they are still embedded in a dark ages of manipulated fear and covert power through disease. Galileo's truth triumphed. Medical truth is doing so now.

The giant medical edifice created by the same pharmaceutical industry that ran Auschwitz is quite different from those days. Their research facilities depend on people who are not eugenicists or racists, but are sincerely seeking cures to end suffering. Those researchers face a giant paradigm change but while it may threaten the "industry" which feeds on diseases, for researchers, the change is exciting for the world and for themselves. They will find a means to build on it and to use it to bring the health they have cared so much to provide.

But the pharmaceutical industry itself rests on a house of cards, dependent on endless suppression of good science and on lies through many corrupted channels of communication, to disparage truth. Doctors, researchers, and agencies are now all saying that the pharmaceutical industry has corrupted medicine itself. So, try as they might, the truth has survived their lies, as well as raids, imprisonment, and no funding, and is bursting forth now to offer an end to the very thing the pharmaceutical industry lives by - fear of disease - and to offer the one thing the pharmaceutical industry cannot tolerate without going under - real cures and health for everyone.

That is so immense and so long sought, it is exploding into consciousness now and cannot be crushed. Just as GMOs are being exposed around the world and even the biggest biotech company is failing, the same is about to begin happening to the pharmaceutical industry as its drugs and vaccines are exposed for all depleting electrons. In actually contributing to disease conditions rather than helping them, the drug industry is doomed. And the research scientists pharma has depended on to lend credibility to its vast empire, though they might want to keep being funded, for how long will they care to work on or be associated with research from a collapsing paradigm held up purely by advertising and corruption, when they can become part of the greatest revolution in medical history? After years of watching patients die from terrible diseases, how many doctors will be eager to shift their practices in order to enjoy the relief and incomparable satisfaction of truly saving people's lives?

Galileo would recognize the repression of science that has kept medicine in the terrible condition it is in. Things are so bad that today doctor error and drugs are leading causes of death, not health. And the same industries cause cancer then turn around and profit from it, in what is now called "the Idiot Cycle."

Galileo might also recognize that in physics collapsing all diseases, toxins, infections and viruses down to one basic - loss of electron flow - he would be seeing a familiar, dramatic reorienting of all thinking around a central sun. Immediately, the chaos of unexplained and uncured diseases which has kept increasing, can be put into an orderly configuration. Suddenly, too, in the battle between drugs and vaccines versus nutritional supplements, things become clarified and fall into a visible hierarchy based on electron contribution or depletion. Long disparaged as "worthless" by the pharmaceutical industry which is now having to relabel them as "dangerous" as so many studies of their efficacy flow in, nutrients win hands down. And their much vaunted drugs and vaccines are cast down as irrefutable and even intentional dangers. Galileo might also recognize that physic's re-ordering of the medical cosmos suddenly explains the wondrous cures that vitamin C has been providing for decades.

Would he also appreciate that physic's elegant simplification of medical chaos collapses endless, confused treatments down to a single ideal one, to meet a single definable purpose? What would he say to physic's marriage to biology yielding the greatest gift imaginable to the world - the end of fear of all diseases?

Surely he would wish us all well in working to end the Pharmaceutical Church's Inquisition.
It is not over. The FDA just banned IV vitamin C as an unapproved drug over Christmas.