by S. Stone
The H1N1 flu vaccines are the flaming Pinto of vaccines. Ralph Nader is badly needed.
Joseph Mercola reports that the product has already been proven to be sickening and even killing people.
By June of 2010, more than 1,000 adverse reactions in children under the age of 5 resulted in the Australian government's banning of flu vaccines for that age group.High fevers, vomiting and convulsions were the most widely reported reactions, which are also associated with long-term adverse health outcomes.Australian "public health experts have called for an independent body to monitor drug safety after it emerged that young children were more likely to end up in hospitals because of side effects from a flu vaccine than they were from the disease itself.In Finland, France and Sweden, narcolepsy was reported in teenage children in response to Pandemrix monovalent swine flu vaccine, leading the Finnish government to suspend its use.In Korea, nearly 2,600 swine flu vaccine side effects were reported as of August 2010, ranging from allergic reactions to fevers to headaches—and including 10 deaths.
According to Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), a special government committee has been created to investigate last year's H1N1 monovalent vaccine for signs it may be associated with more adverse reactions. What the committee found out provisionally is there were three signs of trouble with the H1N1 swine flu vaccine used last year
Fisher outlined these three primary health concerns in a recent NVIC video update:
- Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), an autoimmune disease which has been associated with influenza vaccine since 1976, when the swine flu vaccine was first used. In fact, British government health experts acknowledged the link between the H1N1 vaccine and an increased risk of GBS earlier this month. Prior to this public admittance, the government had always denied such a link
- Idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP), an autoimmune disorder, is a blood clotting disorder characterized by insufficient platelets
- Bell's palsy, a reaction causing temporary facial paralysis
But Nader would face a new product safety terrain, since the US government has become the marketing and PR agent for the manufacturers of this deadly product and during Bush, arranged
"medical martial laws" to force it on people.The other day, I went into a Walgreens store. The store had numerous signs along the road beside it urging people to get their flu shots which I'd never seen done before. And when I went in, before I was even in the door, I was greeted with an invitation to get a flu vaccine. I responded, "Are you joking?" The greeter mumbled something about being forced to say it and it was and walked off. I went to the pharmacy to object and there was met with signs for flu shots, gift cards for flu shots, and the hello from the pharmacist was "Have you had your flu shot yet?"
To be quite frank, it was more than a little off-putting. When I told the pharmacist that, he apologized and said he felt guilty greeting people like that, and even worse giving them the vaccines, because he has never taken a flu shot in his life, doesn't intend to, and doesn't think they're safe. He said it was a new corporate policy and it disturbed him.
The whole H1N1 vaccine (now buried in the seasonal "flu" shot) is part of the most aggressive vaccine campaign ever seen here. People can and have lost jobs for not submitting to this vaccine, one that has never been tested by safety, has no record of efficacy, contains nanoparticles associated with DNA damage, has caused Guillaume Barre, comas, seizures, miscarriages and deaths. And the more flaming the Pinto vaccine is, the more the CDC pushes it.
Since it's clear they are not saving people from anything with the vaccine, what are they doing then? Some say just making money for the vaccine companies. Some say intending to intentionally harm people. But whatever they are doing, truth and human rights are out the window.
The justification for these flaming vaccines was last year's "pandemic." The EU Parliament exposed it was faked and a kickback scheme between the drug companies and the WHO. Media has not covered that here but media is closely connected to the makers of the flaming vaccines.
'A joint investigation by the BMJ and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has uncovered evidence that raises troubling questions about how WHO managed conflicts of interest among the scientists who advised its pandemic planning, and about the transparency of the science underlying its advice to governments. Was it appropriate for WHO to take advice from experts who had declarable financial and research ties with pharmaceutical companies producing antivirals and influenza vaccines? Why was key WHO guidance authored by an influenza expert who had received payment for other work from Roche, manufacturers of oseltamivir, and GlaxoSmithKline, manufacturers of zanamivir? And why does the composition of the emergency committee from which Chan sought guidance remain a secret known only to those within WHO? We are left wondering whether major public health organisations are able to effectively manage the conflicts of interest that are inherent in medical science.'
And the man at the WHO who is the leading "pandemic fear" monger there - from SARS to Ebola to Avian flu to Swine Flu - is under investigation himself for corruption around all this.
"For the past 6 months, one could barely switch on the television in the Netherlands without seeing the face of famed virus hunter Albert Osterhaus talking about the swine flu pandemic. Or so it has seemed. Osterhaus, who runs an internationally renowned virus lab at Erasmus Medical Center, has been Mr. Flu. But last week, his reputation took a nosedive after it was alleged that he has been stoking pandemic fears to promote his own business interests in vaccine development. As Science went to press, the Dutch House of Representatives had even slated an emergency debate about the matter. ...
In an interview with Der Spiegel magazine in Germany, epidemiologist Dr. Tom Jefferson of the Cochrane Collaboration, an organization of independent scientists evaluating all flu related studies, noted the implications of the privatization of WHO and the commercialization of health:
"…one of the extraordinary features of this influenza -- and the whole influenza saga -- is that there are some people who make predictions year after year, and they get worse and worse. None of them so far have come about, and these people are still there making these predictions. For example, what happened with the bird flu, which was supposed to kill us all? Nothing. But that doesn't stop these people from always making their predictions. Sometimes you get the feeling that there is a whole industry almost waiting for a pandemic to occur.SPIEGEL: Who do you mean? The World Health Organization (WHO)?Jefferson: The WHO and public health officials, virologists and the pharmaceutical companies. They've built this machine around the impending pandemic. And there's a lot of money involved, and influence, and careers, and entire institutions! And all it took was one of these influenza viruses to mutate to start the machine grinding...
Along those lines, the CDC which is now saying that everyone over six months should take the vaccines is the same CDC which put out entirely false numbers on the numbers of H1N1 cases last year and may be falsifying data on the number of miscarriages the H1N1 vaccine has caused.
In a relevant footnote, the Washington Post on December 8 in an article on the severity, or lack of same, of the world H1N1 „pandemic" reported that "with the second wave of H1N1 infections having crested in the United States, leading epidemiologists are predicting that the pandemic could end up ranking as the mildest since modern medicine began documenting influenza outbreaks."
We are smack dab in the middle of a pharmaceutical industry fiction, in which a corporation is yet again stealing billions from the public, and it would be really disgusting if it weren't much more - grotesquely dangerous to life.
Vaccines are not a regular product. Would you buy a product when you don't know for sure what is in it, but what is known is clearly toxic, when the package insert states that a percentage of people using that product will die, when the product isn't tested for safety and there is no proof it even works for what it is advertised to do, when the companies making the product which doesn't necessarily work but has a chance of killing you are immune from all liability? And what would you think of the government working for the companies making the product - which you know now is killing people - and using its power on behalf of the corporations to mandate the product or even use the military to force it on you?
And, incredibly, the government has recently created a new rule for the vaccine manufacturers which are already not testing the vaccines, letting them add or change any ingredient with the approval of only one FDA employee (the janitor?). Squalene is not approved in the US because of its link to Gulf War Syndrome. The H1N1 in Europe contained a millions times that dosage, with one doctor there saying it appeared "murderous" to him. Bush, who set in motion the whole pandemic apparatus and inserted the pandemic martial laws, spoke of vaccines with squalene here, and Obama's stimulus package included a large contract for HHS and Novartis to produce it (and cell cultures from dog kidneys). Which means that as bad as the flaming Pinto vaccines already are, at any moment now the manufacturers could include an ingredient associated arthritis, fibromyalgia, lymphadenopathy, rashes, photosensitive rashes, malar rashes, chronic fatigue, chronic headaches, abnormal body hair loss, non-healing skin lesions, aphthous ulcers, dizziness, weakness, memory loss, seizures, mood changes, neuropsychiatric problems, anti-thyroid effects, anaemia, elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), Raynaud's phenomenon, Sjorgren's syndrome, chronic diarrhoea, night sweats and low-grade fevers.
Think of the Pinto. You know it doesn't work right, you know tests show things could go badly wrong and burn people to death, you know that has actually been happening. But the government is withdrawing it but ordering you not only to buy it but to have to drive it - and with your wife and kids in it. Imagine if you say "no" because you don't want to risk it, and you lose your job for that. Imagine the government not only doesn't recall it but creates a rule to let the company put in a part banned in the US. Imagine the government, for the sake of the company, declares a national emergency and says the Pinto now needs no testing at all, and everyone must drive it, and if you don't drive it, the military will give you a choice between going to prison or having you and your whole family strapped into it and being forced to step on the gas.
The difference between the flaming Pinto and the flaming vaccines is you could bail out of the Pinto. They aren't jamming it into your body to have unknown effects for the rest of your and your family's life.
And then when one considers the source of the flaming Pinto vaccine, the pharmaceutical industry, it doesn't reassure that they are one of the most criminally corrupt industries here (they recently won that prize), and that is putting aside their history of being literal war criminals, including killing people with vaccines. It also doesn't reassure that the Nuremberg Code was designed to protect people from being forced into medical experiments but with the mandating of vaccines (which the pharmaceutical industry has arranged through the WHO and various governments over which it has great influence), it entirely evades the very code designed to protect human beings from forced medical "experiments" or "treatments." Through their dark connection to George Bush, they have managed to arrange a potential replay of such forced "treatments."
The manufacturers doesn't have to do squat to prove the flaming Pinto vaccines are safe, and just like with the car, there is already evidence they are in fact very dangerous. Nader got the Pinto recalled. But now, instead of the vaccines being recalled, the public is caught in an unreal but nightmarish corporate scheme in which government plays the PR agent for the pharmaceutical industry, removing their liability, installing laws to mandate their products, putting out false data to scare people into taking something that the government should be protecting people from, and has even arranged to have military on the ground - for a flu? - to force their product on people.
The flaming Pinto H1N1 flu vaccines are a product. And a very bum one at that. There is no pandemic and never was. The H1N1 "pandemic" is a financial and medical and political/military scandal. And the CDC is part of it. It and HHS are not caring health agencies trying to protect the public from a health threat but unconstitutional collusive partners with pharmaceutical corporations, letting them use government power to force their potentially deadly products not just on people but INTO them.
Clearly, the government has no right to subject their own citizens to something that can maim, sterilize or kill them. Ralph Nader needs to revamp what "product safety" means today in the context of corporations using government to fake disease scares and to force products on people which they not only don't want but which could kill them.
The CDC itself says, based on manufacturers' own package inserts - which would tend to understate the danger - that 30,000 people would be expected to die from the H1N1 vaccine. Something is terribly wrong with this vaccine picture.
Would it have been all right for the government to give immunity from liability for the Pinto manufacturers? Would it have been okay for Pinto to have included an insert saying how many people could expect to be burned to death from the car - a kind of warning - while then getting the government to force people into it?
Add together the WWII history of the companies, the ties to Bush, the faked pandemic and terror-mongering for profit and WHO corruption, their non-testing, their non-efficacy, their toxic ingredients, the medical martial laws Bush put in place to try to force them, the disorders and deaths they are already causing, and the Flaming Pinto vaccines may be the most hellish commercial products ever created.
